搜尋結果 Search Result

搜尋結果 : 和" Cultural"有關的資料, 共有41筆
理論化文化認同與帝國邊疆:從羅馬帝國、清帝國到明帝國史料中的西藏
Theorizing Cultural Identity and Empire’s Frontier: From Rome, Qing, to Tibet in Ming Historical Archives
楊仕樂 (Shih-Yueh Yang)
64卷2期(2025/06/30)

中國崛起下東亞區域各國的反應,是近年來廣受關注的議題,中國邊疆地區的反應則相對受到忽略。以人類歷史上並不罕見的多民族大帝國視角來看,曾經的外邦可以收入版圖,曾經的境內也可能叛離或喪失,控制程度的深淺時有變動,在尋求跨越時空通論解釋的國際關係理論視角下,這看似南轅北轍的古今中外不同帝國的收放之間、異族的叛服之間,共通的關鍵因素究竟為何?現實主義所聚焦,物質力量的興衰固然重要;但建構主義的脈絡中,異族對帝國有無文化認同,是否也不可忽視呢?於此,既有研究除關注西方的羅馬帝國,更聚焦於東方的清帝..

The reaction of countries in East Asia under the rise of China has been a topic of widespread concern in recent years, while the reaction of China’s border areas has been relatively ignored. For multi-nation empires throughout human history, foreign territories can be included, and owned territories may also be lost. The degree of control changes from time to time. From the perspective of international relations theories that seek general explanations over a wide range of times and spaces, what exactly are the key factors accounting f..

武裝衝突期間軍隊的文化資產保護角色及其實踐: 2003年伊拉克戰爭的影響
The Military’s Roles and Practices of Cultural Property Protection during Armed Conflicts: The Effects of the Iraq War (2003-2011)
郭雪真(Hsueh-Chen Kuo)
59卷1期(2020/03/01)

武裝衝突期間軍隊保護人類文化資產的角色,國際人道法、國際人權法與國際刑法訂有相關的義務及規範,但此義務或法律規範具體的落實則是有賴於國際組織與強國(主要是美國)在不同的戰爭或武裝衝突期間的實際經驗。即使美國在2003年伊拉克戰爭前已經規劃保護當地文化資產的措施,軍隊及其盟軍仍遭致批評未能保護文化資產。後續2004年在科索沃戰爭期間未能保護東正教(Eastern Orthodox)修道院及防止種族屠殺之間的兩難、2005年在伊拉克薩馬拉(Samarra)歷史1..

This research tries to explore the evolution of international laws regarding the cultural property protection (CPP) during the event of armed conflict with armed forces having obligations to protect cultural property from Law of War, International Humanitarian Law, Law of International Human Rights and International Criminal Law. However, the international practices were based on the interactions of international politics and international laws have been played by great powers (particularly United States) in wars or armed con..

聯合國糧食議題安全化內容與中國糧食安全治理機制
Securitization of Food Issues in the UN and China's Food Security Governance
林義鈞(Scott Y. Lin)
56卷3期(2017/09/01)

本文起源於兩大研究問題:誰在治理中國的糧食安全?中國糧食安全嗎?因此使用聯合國糧食安全定義分析中國大陸糧食安全治理機制與治理狀況,主要發現有兩點:第一是糧食議題的安全化進展。聯合國雖然從 1970 年代中葉就開始進行糧食議題的安全化,並且逐步在 1970 年代將糧食充足性,1980 年代將糧食可取得性,1990 年代將食物使用性等項目列入糧食安全的指標中,但是氣候變遷卻在 21 世紀初期成為威脅糧食安全的新變數,使得糧食供需及取得的穩定性在近期成為糧食安全的..

This paper arises from an attempt to answer the two following questions: (1)Who is responsible for China’s food security governance?(2)Is China’s food security status secured? Definition of food security constructed by the United Nations(UN)was applied to analyze China’s food security governance and status, with two important findings. First, regarding securitization of the food issues, while the UN has gradually taken food availability(since the 1970s), accessibility(since the 1980s), and utilization and sa..

top