搜尋結果 Search Result

搜尋結果 : 和" Power"有關的資料, 共有97筆
歐盟印太經濟協定中的規範性權力運作: 歐越自由貿易協定與歐中全面投資協定之比較
EU’s Operation of Normative Power in Economic Agreements in the Indo-Pacific Region: Comparison of the EUVFTA and the EU-China CAI
賴昀辰 (Yun-Chen Lai)
64卷4期(2025/12/18)

本研究探索造成《歐盟—越南自由貿易協定》(EUVFTA)和《歐盟—中國全面投資協定》(EU-China CAI)不同結果的影響因素。歐越自貿協定及歐中投資協定皆將永續發展及勞工權利等貿易永續願景納入歐盟貿易政策,亦即兩者皆為歐盟所謂的新世代經貿協定。然而在實務上,兩項協定命運卻有很大的差異。本研究透過現實主義、自由主義和社會建構主義三大國際關係主流理論,探索影響兩個協定發展的戰略、制度和意識形態因素。本文認為,儘管理念上的規範性力量有其重要性,但戰略夥伴關係、既存..

This thesis investigates the differing results of the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EUVFTA) and the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI). Both agreements are designed to embed sustainability and labor rights within the EU’s trade policies. By applying realism, liberalism, and social constructivism, the study examines the strategic, institutional, and ideological elements that impact these agreements. It is posited that although normative power is essential, practical factors concerning strategic partnerships, instit..

「橋接」數位分歧: 歐盟在印太數位治理中的角色
“Bridging” Digital Divides: The EU’s Role in Indo-Pacific Digital Governance
張詠詠 (Yung-Yung Chang)
64卷4期(2025/12/18)

在科技快速發展的時代,數位領域已成為地緣政治競爭的核心,重塑全球治理、安全與經濟格局。美中日益激烈的科技競爭正在加速全球數位秩序的分化,其核心問題在於全球網路治理規範的分歧,反映出不同價值觀與政策優先事項的對立。在此背景下,印太地區憑藉其經濟潛力與科技創新能力,成為推動數位轉型與治理的關鍵戰場。 除了美中競爭,歐盟(EU)作為全球規範性權力(Normative Power Europe, NPE),也試圖在印太地區的數位秩序中發揮影響。然而,相較於美國以市場驅動(market-d..

In an era of rapid technological advancement, the digital domain has become a core battleground for geopolitical competition, reshaping global governance, security, and economic structures. The intensifying U.S.-China technological rivalry is accelerating the fragmentation of the global digital order, with the key challenge being the divergence in global cyber governance norms, reflecting conflicting values and policy priorities. Against this backdrop, the Indo-Pacific region, with its economic potential and technological innovation capacit..

規範性權力仍然有效?理論分析與我國製造業問卷對歐盟產業政策的回應
Is Normative Power Still Valid? Theoretical Explanations and the Responses of Taiwan’s Manufacturing to the EU’s Industrial Policies
葉國俊 (Kuo-Chun Yeh) 陳馨蕙 (Shin-Hui Chen)
64卷4期(2025/12/18)

歐盟「規範性權力」(Normative Power)概念源自歐盟東擴計畫,檢視歐盟堅持普世價值並藉以推行各項對外政策成果,多著眼於法政與自由貿易協議而產業政策較為少見,因為歐盟產業政策本是新近議題。本文建構一個歐盟同時追求既有價值原則,同時面對近期經濟安全去風險趨勢與追求經濟繁榮的「不可能三角」理論,說明目前面對地緣政治與供應鏈變動衝擊,兼以成員國立場不一致下,堅持「規範性權力」推行普世價值難度增加,將提升歐盟政策選擇的不確定性。我們以臺灣製造業上市櫃公司問卷結果進行驗證,證明歐盟以價值..

“Normative Power” originates from the EU's enlargement, emphasizing the commitment to universal values and its achievements in implementing various foreign policies. This concept mainly focuses on legal-political matters and free trade agreements, while industrial policy is less prominent, as it is a relatively recent issue for the EU. This paper constructs a theoretical framework of the “impossible trinity,” wherein the EU simultaneously pursues its established value principles, addresses recent trends in econom..

中國也有「印太戰略」嗎? 攻勢現實主義的觀點
Is There a China’s “Indo-Pacific Strategy”? An Offensive Realism Perspective
吳峻鋕 (Jun-zhi Wu) 張文揚 (Wen-yang Chang)
63卷4期(2024/12/01)

不論從當前的理論或是實務發展來看,中國在2010年以來的對外主要 作為均以其一帶一路倡議以及亞洲基礎設施投資銀行作為分析要點,而美 國的對應則聚焦在歐巴馬總統開始,並在川普與拜登時期成熟的印太戰略 上。學界與政策界對兩國互動的研析,不外乎是基於這樣的戰略架構討 論。不過,中國如何在近年發展之中逐漸形成一套在亞洲地區的策略,用 以應對美國及其盟友的印太戰略,目前並沒有一套較完整的架構解析。本 文認為,雖然在政策偏向、對外原則以及價值觀等面向,中國並沒有採用 美國及其盟國所主張的「印太戰略」..

From either theory or practice, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) have been identified as two major foreign behaviors of China. To respond, the United States adopts the Indo Pacific Strategy which started in the Obama administration and developed in Trump and Biden administrations. Though scholars and policy practitioners apply the aforementioned strategies to analyze US-China relations, the understanding of China’s strategy in Asia is still underdeveloped. This paper argues that while ..

權力平衡理論之再推進:體系抑或狀態之辨
Further Advancement of the Balance of Power Theory: The Distinction between System and Situation
唐豪駿 (Hao-chun Tang) 明居正 (Chu-cheng Ming)
63卷3期(2024/09/01)

本文旨在釐清學界對於「權力平衡狀態」與「權力平衡體系」的內涵混淆,透過對「權力平衡體系」進行嚴謹的定義,推進權力平衡理論的解釋力。 學界一直對「權力平衡」的理解有許多誤解與偏見,其中,誤將「狀態」等同於「體系」是最常見的問題。本文先回顧華爾茲(Kenneth Waltz)對於體系的界定,指出其中的不足之處,並借用建構主義溫特(Alexander Wendt)的理論來補充。描繪出我們對於權力平衡體系的文化、結構與邏輯等論點。 藉由對體系進行嚴謹的定義,不但使得「權力平衡狀態..

This article aims to clarify the confusion among academic circles about the connotations of “Balance of Power Situation” and “Balance of Power System” and to advance the explanatory power of BOP theory through a rigorous definition of “Balance of Power System.” There have always been many misunderstandings and deviations in “Balance of Power.” Mistaking “situation” with “system” is the most common problem. This article first reviews the definition of “system&r..

top