搜尋結果 Search Result

搜尋結果 : 和" US"有關的資料, 共有371筆
轉變國際秩序下「中立」概念之地位
The Status of "Neutrality" in the Changing International Order
蕭琇安(Hsiu-An Hsiao)
47卷1期(2008/03/01)

從兩次世界大戰至今,國際政治結構與秩序發生幾次重大的轉變。集體安全制度的形成、戰爭形態的改變、以及全球化與區域化發展所帶來新的問題與威脅等,使傳統「中立」制度與觀念面臨存廢的挑戰。另一方面,實踐上,有關「中立」概念的主張與應用卻始終存在。有鑒於此,本文擬從國際政治發展的不同階段,以宏觀的角度來探討「中立」概念的源起以及法律與政策面的發展與轉變,嘗試對「中立」概念在現代國際秩序中的角色與作用進行理論和實踐的觀察與分析。 從法律層面來看,傳..

Since the two World Wars, the structure and order of international politics have undergone considerable changes. In particular, the creation of the collective security system, new forms of warfare and new problems and threats emerging from globalization and regionalization, challenge the value of “neutrality” in the new international environment. But in practice, contrary to stated facts, states continue to make use of the concept under international law or in international politics. Thus, this article tries to pr..

量化研究的比較問題邏輯:因果異質性與縣市長選舉投票模型的建立
The Logic of Quantitative Research in Comparative Inquiries: On Casual Heterogeneity and Model Building of Voting Behaviors in Magisterial and Mayoral Elections in Taiwan
黃信豪(Hsin-Hao Huang)
46卷3期(2007/09/01)

在調查資料的累積下,研究者可運用計量方法來進行以「比較問題」為目的之實證研究。在問題取向上除了針對特定主題進行跨年度的比較外,學者也關注不同國家或區域的比較研究,也可依理論設定,對特定標的從事比較問題設定。 本文的目的在於從方法論出發,探討從事計量研究時所應關切的比較問題邏輯。首先,作者說明比較研究的問題本質,並提出比較單元與分析單位異同時的不同研究架構;接著進一步討論在比較的架構下,如何運用適當計量模型設定方式,方能對於比較問題提出直..

In recent years, it is possible that researchers apply quantitative method to comparative inquiries by the accumulation of cross-sectional survey data. Accordingly, some political scientists start to explore and study comparative inquiries tested by pooled cross sectional data, sorted by the units such as time, countries and some specific subjects guided through theoretical postulates. This paper is concerned about the logic and application of quantitative research methodologically, especially in comparative inquir..

東協國家與東亞經濟合作:從“東協加三”到“東亞高峰會”
ASEAN and the East Asia Economic Integration: From "ASEAN plus Three" to "East Asia Summit"
吳玲君(Lin-Jun Wu)
46卷2期(2007/06/01)

本文主要目的在分析東協國家對此一波「東亞區域」合作與整合的認知差異,以此分析此一波以東協為核心的東亞合作發展的前景。東亞區域經濟合作與整合是一個多元且複雜的過程,此一波的合作中,東協國家始終強調要扮演掌舵者的角色,並堅持各項以「東協加三」為基礎的合作都要在東協的組織架構中進行,希望對東亞區域的合作議程有實際的主導權。然而,在實踐上,東協國家之間的合作模式本來就較容易受外力的影響,面對中國、日本所提議不同版本的合作,東協成員之間有不同程度的吸引及排斥,也造成了..

The purpose of this paper is to examine perceived differences among the ASEAN countries toward East Asia regional cooperation and integration, and to analyze the prospect of recent regional cooperation with ASEAN members in the foremost position of such development. Regional economic cooperation and integration in East Asia is a diversified and complicated process. Since the beginning, ASEAN countries have been emphasizing on their principal role in leading the process. They want to play a dominant role in influencing the age..

top