期刊內容 Issue content

回列表
從直選總統與民主化談政黨體系變遷：歐洲國家的比較研究
Directly Elected President, Democratization and Party System Change: A Comparative Study on European Countries
沈有忠 (Yu-chung Shen) 陳宥辰 (You-chen Chen)
下載檔案 DOWNLOAD
60卷3期(2021/09/01)

政黨政治向來為研究憲政運作、民主深化的核心議題。過往的研究，多將政黨政治視為影響憲政與民主的自變項，但憲政特性以及民主轉型的過程，也可能系統性的影響政黨體系，對於政黨體系變遷的規模、機率，存在一定的關連性。基於此，本文以政黨體系變遷為依變數，從制度特性以及民主化背景來觀察政黨體系變遷的特性。核心假設有三：首先，就制度特性而言，直選總統的國家，比起議會內閣制的國家，政黨體系變遷的機率較高、規模較大；第二，以選舉時程而言，也是制度面向的因素，在直選總統的國家中，同時選舉或蜜月選舉，因為總統衣尾效應較強，引起國會內政黨體系變遷的機率也較高。此外，因為小黨在總統選舉容易邊緣化，因此同時選舉或蜜月選舉下，小黨泡沫化的機率也較高；第三，非制度面向的部分，從民主化時程與轉型遺緒來看，歐洲國家中，後共轉型的新興民主，相較於歐洲中的老牌民主而言，政黨體系變遷的機率也較高。

Party politics is an important issue to explain the constitutional work and consolidation of a democracy, and especially for newly democracies. If the party system would be affected by different types of constitutional systems and historical legacy, the party system should also be changed. We have three hypotheses: first, we suppose those countries with a directly elected president will have a higher probability for party system change. And the smaller parties are more likely out of parliament. Second, based on the coattail effect, countries with the concurrent election or the honeymoon election will have a higher probability for party system change. Third, the degree of democratization will also be an important variable in measuring party system change. The party system change will have a higher probability in new democracies, such as in Central and Eastern Europe. Therefore, this paper goes to show that among these three hypotheses, directly elected president and electoral timing are institutional variables, while the degree of democratization is historical legacy.
直選總統選舉時程民主化 歐洲 Party System Change Direct Elected President Electoral Timing Democratization European

相關期刊

「緬甸式」民主化:正當性、政權轉移、與政治改革
The Burmese Way of Democratization: Legitimacy, Transition, and Political Reform
孫采薇(Tsai-Wei Sun)
54卷4期(2015/12/01)

自從 1962 年便落入軍事威權統治的緬甸，在 2010 年 11 月 7 日舉行自 1990 年以來首次的聯邦與地方議會大選，並在 2011 年 3 月 30 日隨著新總統登盛的宣誓就職，而從軍政府正式轉型至文人政府。此後登盛政府進行了一系列改革措施，頗令人耳目一新。本文主旨在解讀緬甸自 1948 年獨立以來的政治發展，並將 2011 年以降的政治改革放在威權政體尋求政治正當性的歷史脈絡中來觀察，而認為當軍政府的國內正當性鞏固工程在本世紀初面臨因經濟困境所..

The Burmese military has been successful in maintaining its authoritarian rule in the past decades. In 2011, however, the junta shifted its power to the civilian government despite the absence of inside or outside political pressure . Since then, the new government has introduced many reforms that allow greater political liberty in Burma. This paper locates the junta’s power shift as part of a wider process of the military consolidating political legitimacy. It argues that as the junta’s power consolidation reache..

路徑相依或制度選擇?論民主轉型與憲法變遷的模式
Path Dependence or Collective Institutional Choice? Modeling Constitutional Changes in the Context of Democratic Transitions
葉俊榮(Jiunn-Rong Yeh)張文貞(Wen-Chen Chang)
45卷6期(2006/11/01)

1980 年代中期以來，包括台灣在內的部分亞洲、中東歐、中南美等國家紛紛進行民主轉型，並帶動新一波的憲法變遷。不過，在民主轉型的脈絡中，憲法究竟扮演何種角色，則一直未受到充分學術探討。本文旨在深究民主轉型與憲法變遷間的互動關係。 在研究方法上，本文歸納分析民主轉型國家的憲法變遷，提出四種主要的模式:轉型初期一次制憲、轉型初期一次大幅修憲、階段式制憲、多次漸進修憲。其次則從主權因素、政權更迭、憲政傳統以及國際干預的四個面向，探討民主轉型國..

Many countries in East and Central Europe, Central and South America, and Asia, including Taiwan, undertook democratic transitions amidst the 1980s, which triggered a new wave of constitutional change. The role of constitutional change in the context of democratic transitions, however, has not been explored and discussed fully by scholars in the field. This article aims at addressing this issue and focuses on the interactions between democratic transitions and constitutional change. In order to analyze constitution..

top