搜尋結果 Search Result

搜尋結果 : 和" Institutionalism"有關的資料, 共有22筆
歷史制度論觀點的墨西哥農村再生與觀光:「魔幻農村計畫」
A Historical Institutionalism Perspective on Rural Regeneration and Tourism in Mexico: “Pueblos Mágicos”
徐胤承 (Yin-Cheng Hsu) 楊名豪 (Ming-Hao Yang)
64卷2期(2025/06/30)

本文擬以「歷史制度論」嘗試回答以下的研究課題:「墨西哥的觀光導向農村再生模式為何形成?其中又有何特殊之處?」繼則闡述:就行動者來說,由於該國政府在歷史進程上長期以國家之力主導旅遊業,並爭取全方位地提升旅遊吸引力,包括從無到有,打造類似阿卡普爾科(西班牙文:Acapulco)與坎昆(西班牙文:Cancún)經驗的新興城市,故能在全球觀光體系內,扮演著旅遊舞臺的鋪設者角色,進而廣受世人矚目,無形之中致使所謂「路徑依賴」(path dependence)於焉產生。嗣再迎來接受新自..

This paper employs a historical institutionalism framework to address the research question: What accounts for the formation of Mexico’s tourismoriented rural revitalization model, and what are its distinctive features? It then seeks to elucidate the following points: the Mexican government has historically taken a state-led approach to tourism development, striving to enhance the country’s appeal as a global destination in a comprehensive manner. This has included the creation of entirely new cities, such as Acapulco and Canc&u..

半總統制下的立法課責:臺灣與法國國會制度面的比較研究
Legislative Accountability under Semi- presidentialism: An Institutional Comparison between Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan and French National Assembly
陳月卿 (Yueh-ching Chen) 廖達琪 (Da-chi Liao)
60卷1期(2021/03/01)

本文探討半總統制下的立法課責,以臺灣與法國為個案進行比較研究。「立法課責」指如何讓立法者(集體或個別)的所作所為能為利害關係人知道,而據以獎懲。過去比較臺、法的研究發現,總理總統制的法國,國會的運作型態較偏內閣制;總統議會制的臺灣,運作則較偏總統制,因而在傳統印象上,多會認為法國會較重視以政黨為對象的集體課責,臺灣則可能較偏重以候選人或立委為對象的個別課責。   本文乃透過制度規範上對選舉前與選舉後的資訊公開要求,比較臺灣與法國在集體課責與個別課..

This paper explores the legislative accountability under semi- presidentialism and uses the case study approach to compare Taiwan with France. “Legislative accountability” refers to how the actions of legislators (collectively or individually) can be known to interested parties, and how rewards and punishments can be used accordingly. The literature comparing Taiwan and France in the past found that the parliamentary operation of the French premier-presidential system is most similar to a cabinet system; whereas Taiwan’s p..

日本2001年至2012年預算權改革:不同制度安排之比較
The Japanese Reform on Budget Formulation (2009~2012): Changes and Continuity
林超琦(Chao-Chi Lin)
54卷2期(2015/06/01)

日本政府分別於 2001 年與 2009 年兩度改革預算制度,都是在內閣層級設立新的組織,移轉部分預算編列權限到內閣,希望透過改變編列預算的方式,來提高首相與內閣領導力,並解決各省廳的本位問題。前者是在內閣府設立經財政諮詢會議,後者則是分別在內閣官房與內閣府設立國家戰略室與行政刷新會議。儘管小泉內閣時期,透過經濟財政諮詢會議改革原有的預算編列方式,也成功地刪減財政支出,以及民主黨執政初期,行政刷新會議做出刪減預算的決定,國家戰略室也有設定降低財政赤字的目標,..

The Japanese government reformed its budget institutions and budget processes in 2001 and 2009, establishing the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy(CEFP)in 2001, and the National Strategy Office(NSO)and the Government Revitalization Unit(GRU)in 2009. By moving the Ministry of Finance’s budget formulation authority to the Cabinet, it was expected that these new institutions would facilitate the prime minister’s leadership. However, despite institutional changes, the budget formulation processes and the existing ..

top