本文檢視全世界民主國家在不同總統與國會選制的搭配組合下,政黨體系有何不同。本文發現,就國會選制而言,國會選舉採比例代表制的國家, 其國會有效政黨數在整體上明顯多於國會選舉採單一選區相對多數制的國家;而不論是國會選舉採比例代表制或是採單一選區相對多數制的國家,有總統直選制度之國家的國會有效政黨數,明顯少於無總統直選制度的國家。 進一步言,在國會選舉採比例代表制的國家中,若總統選舉採相對多數制,其國會有效政黨數會少於總統選舉採兩輪決選制的國家;不過,在國會選舉採單一選區相對多數制的國家中,不論總統選舉採行相對多數制或兩輪決選制,其國會有效政黨數的差異不大。
就總統選制而言,總統選舉採相對多數制的國家,其總統有效候選人數在整體上明顯少於總統選舉採兩輪決選制的國家。進一步觀察,會發現在總統選舉採相對多數制的國家中,若國會選舉採單一選區相對多數制,則總統有效候選人數顯得更少。而在總統選舉採兩輪決選制的國家中,若國會選舉採比例代表制,則總統有效候選人數顯得更多。至於總統選舉採相對多數制而國會選舉採比例代表制的國家,以及總統選舉採兩輪決選制而國會選舉採單一選區相對多數制的國家,這兩類國家的總統有效候選人數明顯介於前兩類國家之間。
This study comprehensively observes the party system under different collocations of presidential and parliamentary electoral system in democracies all over the world. Regarding parliamentary electoral system, it is found that the effective number of parliamentary parties in the countries adopting proportional representation system(PR), overall, is apparently larger than that in countries adopting plurality with single-member-district system(SMD), and that in countries holding direct presidential elections is clearly smaller than that in countries not holding direct presidential elections, regardless of which is adopted for parliamentary electoral system. Furthermore, as for countries adopting PR for parliamentary electoral system, the effective number of parliamentary parties in countries adopting plurality system for presidential electoral system is smaller than that in countries adopting majority system for presidential electoral system. However, as for countries adopting SMD for parliamentary electoral system, there is little difference in the effective number of parliamentary parties no matter whether plurality or majority system is adopted for presidential electoral system.
Regarding the presidential electoral system, the effective number of presidential candidates in countries adopting plurality system for presidential electoral system, overall, is smaller than that in countries adopting majority system for presidential electoral system. To explore further, it is found that in countries adopting plurality system for presidential electoral system the effective number of presidential candidates appears smaller if SMD is adopted for parliamentary electoral system. However, in countries adopting majority system for presidential electoral system, the effective number of presidential candidates appears larger if PR is adopted for parliamentary electoral system. As for countries adopting plurality system for presidential electoral system and PR for parliamentary electoral system, and countries adopting majority system for presidential electoral system and SMD for parliamentary electoral system, the effective numbers of presidential candidates obviously lie between those of the above-mentioned two groups of countries.
1990年統一前,東德由德國社會主義統一黨進行威權統治,西德則為一個自由民主國家,政黨在公平的競爭制度中運作。兩德統一後,政治制度迥異的兩個體系在重整過程中,必然會出現嚴重的磨合現象。不同於以往探究政黨體系僅重視體系內單純的「相關性政黨數字」的變化,與政黨「意識形態」距離與強度的差異,本論文試著從「社會分歧」(social cleavage)出發,觀察德國統一以來,社會結構分歧程度與政黨反應此基礎所呈現的互動關係,並說明政黨勢力的興衰,如何合作結盟或是分裂結構,已呈現德國政黨體系的內涵特..
Before German unification in 1990, East Germany/GDR was authoritarian-governed by the Socialist Unity Party of Germany and West Germany/FRG was a democratic state with a relatively fair competitive party system. Serious conflicts between totally different political systems must have emerged when they started to become a unified state. Differing from the traditional approach to studying party systems through party numbers and ideologies, the author will, through “social cleavage,” examine how German parties reflect the change of ..
請輸入想查詢的期刊標題、關鍵字、作者相關資訊. Please enter the journal title, keywords, and author-related information you want to query.