最新期刊 Latest issue

複雜式避險策略研究:立陶宛、匈牙利與土耳其的安全策略選擇
The Study of Complex Hedging Strategies: Security Policy Choices of Lithuania, Hungary, and Turkey
楊三億 (San-Yi Yang)
64卷3期(2025/09/01)

中小型國家在當前國際體系下的數目眾多,這些國家有各自國家利益與偏好,因此理解這群國家的策略選擇可以更全面地了解國際關係發展。本文研究設計有以下幾個特色:第一,本文以歐洲的中小型國家為個案研究標的,擇立陶宛、匈牙利與土耳其三國進行分析,這三國分別位於當前東/西歐對立環境的最前沿,透過觀察這些國家可理解地緣斷層帶上中小型國家面對歐、俄強權競爭時的策略選擇。第二,由於中國近年不斷向歐洲拋射影響力,歐洲國家明顯感受到中國政策影響,歐洲的中小型國家傳統上面對歐/俄兩強環境已出現變化,由於中國不斷崛..

Small and medium-sized states constitute a substantial portion of the contemporary international system. These states possess distinct national interests and preferences; hence, examining their strategic choices provides a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics of international relations. This study is characterized by several key features. First, it focuses on European small and medium-sized states through the case studies of Lithuania, Hungary, and Turkey. These countries are situated on the geopolitical frontlines of the current East..

「避險」考量下的歐中關係: 「歐俄之間的外交歧異」如何影響 「歐洲各國與中國之間的合作與衝突」
Europe-China Relations Under the Logic of Hedging: How “Diplomatic Divergences Between Europe and Russia” Shape “Cooperation and Conflict Between European Countries and China”
薛健吾 (Chien-Wu Alex Hsueh)
64卷3期(2025/09/01)

本文研究同時具有「北約組織」和「歐盟」會員國身分的歐洲國家與中國之間的關係。同時具有這兩個會員國身分的國家,除了是歐洲「最為民主」和「最具安全保障」的國家之外,也因為須配合這兩個國際建制的官方立場,因而在理論上應該要對中國採取方向一致的經濟、外交和安全政策。然而,近年來,隨著「美國對中政策的轉變」、「歐盟在移民和經濟議題上的分裂」,以及「北約組織各國在安全議題上的分歧」,中國對歐洲國家「分而治之」的爭議也浮上檯面。在經濟和安全皆有保障的情況之下,是否有什麼系統性的因素可以解釋歐洲各國與中..

This paper examines the relationships between China and the European countries that hold dual membership in both NATO and EU. These countries, being among the most democratic and secure in Europe, are theoretically expected to adopt consistent economic, diplomatic, and security policies toward China in line with the official positions of these two international institutions. However, in recent years, shifts in U.S. policy towards China, divisions within the EU on migration and economic issues, and security disagreements within NATO have bro..

索羅門群島外交政策中的「避險」意涵探析
An Analysis of the “Hedging” Implications in the Foreign Policy of the Solomon Islands
張凱銘 (Kai-Ming Chang)
64卷3期(2025/09/01)

作為太平洋島國地區成員之一的索羅門群島,近年和美國、中國、澳洲等國家皆往來密切,成為各方積極拉攏的合作對象,其外交動向備受國際社會矚目。本文運用國際關係研究中的「避險戰略」分析索羅門群島外交政策,該戰略建議現代國家面臨利害交錯的複雜情境時,宜跳脫傳統的「平衡/扈從」二分思維,改以雙向投注作法同時迴避安全損害及利益損失風險。研究結果顯示索羅門群島雖是發展程度低落且國內情勢不穩的小型島國,卻能在美中競逐的混沌局面中靈活遊走,同步交好各方以擴大外部援助、增進國家安全並提升國際地位,其外交施政體..

As a member of the Pacific Islands region, the Solomon Islands has developed close ties with countries such as the United States, China, and Australia in recent years, making itself an actively courted partner of relevant countries, its diplomatic orientation therefore attracted the attention of the international community. This article used the “hedging strategy” in international relations studies to analyze the foreign policy of the Solomon Islands. The research of “hedging strategy” suggests modern countries shoul..

理論化文化認同與帝國邊疆:從羅馬帝國、清帝國到明帝國史料中的西藏
Theorizing Cultural Identity and Empire’s Frontier: From Rome, Qing, to Tibet in Ming Historical Archives
楊仕樂 (Shih-Yueh Yang)
64卷2期(2025/06/30)

中國崛起下東亞區域各國的反應,是近年來廣受關注的議題,中國邊疆地區的反應則相對受到忽略。以人類歷史上並不罕見的多民族大帝國視角來看,曾經的外邦可以收入版圖,曾經的境內也可能叛離或喪失,控制程度的深淺時有變動,在尋求跨越時空通論解釋的國際關係理論視角下,這看似南轅北轍的古今中外不同帝國的收放之間、異族的叛服之間,共通的關鍵因素究竟為何?現實主義所聚焦,物質力量的興衰固然重要;但建構主義的脈絡中,異族對帝國有無文化認同,是否也不可忽視呢?於此,既有研究除關注西方的羅馬帝國,更聚焦於東方的清帝..

The reaction of countries in East Asia under the rise of China has been a topic of widespread concern in recent years, while the reaction of China’s border areas has been relatively ignored. For multi-nation empires throughout human history, foreign territories can be included, and owned territories may also be lost. The degree of control changes from time to time. From the perspective of international relations theories that seek general explanations over a wide range of times and spaces, what exactly are the key factors accounting f..

top