搜尋結果 Search Result

搜尋結果 : 和"政治"有關的資料, 共有322筆
戰略三角理論與台灣的三角政治
The Strategic Triangle Theory and the Taiwanese Triangle Strategy
初國華(Gwo-Hua Chu)張昌吉(Chun-Chig Chang)
49卷1期(2010/03/01)

自 Dittmer 開啟戰略三角的國際政治理論後,三邊戰略探討便成為頗具詮釋力的理論模型。從冷戰時期的「美、蘇、中」戰略三角到近期的其它戰略三角,如「美、中、歐盟」、「美、中、印度」等等,族衍甚繁。 然而在東亞區域間的「美、中、台」戰略三角,隨著「中國崛起」的世界性影響與美國的東亞區域霸權穩定與利益,更使「美、中、台」戰略三角凸顯其重要性與區域霸權穩定或轉移的關鍵。以「美、蘇、中」戰略三角為立論基礎的 Dittmer 戰略三角論,是基於..

Since Lowell Dittmer proposed the theory of strategic triangle, the theory has become a powerful explanatory model that developed various triangles from the US-Soviet Union-China strategic triangle in the Cold War to the other more recent triangles like the US-China-EU and the US-China- India. Among various triangles, the US-China-Taiwan triangle has evolved into a relatively more critical one in terms of its impact on the regional hegemonic stability or shift in East Asia due to the rise of China that is shaking the US hegem..

經濟扭轉政治?中共「惠台政策」的政治影響
Limitations on China's Economic Statecraft: China's Favor-Granting Policies and Their Political Implications
耿曙(Shu Keng)
48卷3期(2009/09/01)

當前兩岸關係基本結構為「政治疏離、經濟融合」。因此,如何掌握經濟「影響」政治的力量,便成為前瞻兩岸未來的重要憑藉,另方面,如何利用或防範經濟左右政治的力量,則成為兩岸相互攻防的關鍵場域。故自胡錦濤主導對台政策後,即持續強化「寄希望於台灣人民」的各種所謂「惠台」措施,希望以此促進兩岸和平統一,但能否發揮其所期待的作用,迄今未見比較系統的評估,有鑒於此,本文根據近期民調資料,分別就一般民眾及目標社群進行觀察,分析其對中觀感與政治立場的變化,藉以蠡測此類「以經促統..

The confrontation across the Taiwan Strait has been extended from the Cold War years to the global era. Under the new circumstance, cross-Strait exchanges and contacts are not only close but also indispensible for both. And, such socioeconomic ties can be easily employed as instruments to achieve political goals. Motivated by the logic, after Hu Jintao being in charge, China has shifted its Taiwan policy from “more sticks” to “extra carrots.” The core elements of Hu’s economic statecraft are &ldq..

不確定裡的確定與過時裡的不過時-重看雷蒙‧阿弘冷戰時期的國際政治理論
The Certainty within Uncertainty, the Non-Passing of Time within the Passing of Time-Essay About the Overcoming of the Theory of International Relations during the Cold War Period by Raymond Aron
閻嘯平(Hsiao-Ping Yen)
48卷2期(2009/06/01)

儘管阿弘認為自己的國際政治理論只適用於冷戰時期,但基於 20 世紀中葉以來日益強調不確定性的科學走向,並參照摩根索、瓦爾茲等人對科學概念的理解,今天似乎可以從三個知識論層級看出他的理論並沒有過時的問題:第一、在元理論層次,他以一系列的二律背反和特殊符碼,點明了許多不確定性的問題;第二、在元結構層次,他透過社會學與歷史學的方法論,將當事人與政治實體推出更嚴謹的二項式互動結構;第三、在實踐學層次,他對一系列外交行為提出二律背反的探索,從而不但超越了精確科學在確定..

It is with regards of the importance of the uncertainty for the current scientific philosophy that we want to interpret the theory of the international relations of the Cold War by Raymond Aron, using the comprehension which is concerned with the scientific conceptions of Mogenthau, Waltz, and others; and we want to verify not only that this theory keeps a sort of efficiency until today, but also that Aron has found some theories about the uncertainty on a higher level. We first want to show, in the field of metathe..

top