各期期刊 All issues

從議程設定論國際經貿規範之法制化:以「市場擾亂」概念的發展與演化為例
Market Disruption in the International Economic Law Processes of Legalization: A Study from the Perspective of Agenda-Setting
曾雅真(Yea-Jen Tseng)
46卷3期(2007/09/01)

討論國際經貿規範的法制化過程,無法規避國際法與國家間的權力運作問題,更不能忽視國際社會不存在最高權威之國際無政府狀態的事實。國際社會存在國家資源暨地位的不對稱差異,使強權得以操縱國際經貿議程,建構符合強權利益的國際經貿規範。形式上,國際經貿規範的法制化,係參與者基於對等地位,透過雙邊暨多邊談判後所建構而成的法律,但其實質內容,仍反映強權國家在不對等的基礎上,操縱談判議程,鑲嵌強權利益,扭曲平等正義,強化本國優勢,限制對手經貿發展機會之事實。 ..

It is hard to neglect neither the fact of power competition nor the anarchic character of the international society as scholar researches the context and the practice of international law. The asymmetric distribution of international resources enhances the possibility for powerful states to manipulate the agenda of International Economic law legalization processes, which are therefore constructed in according with the interests of the international Powers. Formally, international economic laws are instituted through bilateral..

量化研究的比較問題邏輯:因果異質性與縣市長選舉投票模型的建立
The Logic of Quantitative Research in Comparative Inquiries: On Casual Heterogeneity and Model Building of Voting Behaviors in Magisterial and Mayoral Elections in Taiwan
黃信豪(Hsin-Hao Huang)
46卷3期(2007/09/01)

在調查資料的累積下,研究者可運用計量方法來進行以「比較問題」為目的之實證研究。在問題取向上除了針對特定主題進行跨年度的比較外,學者也關注不同國家或區域的比較研究,也可依理論設定,對特定標的從事比較問題設定。 本文的目的在於從方法論出發,探討從事計量研究時所應關切的比較問題邏輯。首先,作者說明比較研究的問題本質,並提出比較單元與分析單位異同時的不同研究架構;接著進一步討論在比較的架構下,如何運用適當計量模型設定方式,方能對於比較問題提出直..

In recent years, it is possible that researchers apply quantitative method to comparative inquiries by the accumulation of cross-sectional survey data. Accordingly, some political scientists start to explore and study comparative inquiries tested by pooled cross sectional data, sorted by the units such as time, countries and some specific subjects guided through theoretical postulates. This paper is concerned about the logic and application of quantitative research methodologically, especially in comparative inquir..

論析美國「四年期國防總檢」的立法要求與影響
A Study of the Legislation and Impacts of the U.S. Quadrennial Defense Review
陳勁甫(Ching-Pu Chen)邱榮守(Jung-Shou Chiou)
46卷3期(2007/09/01)

美國為因應後冷戰時期國際安全環境與威脅的改變,至 1996 年止已執行多次全面性的兵力結構檢討。然而,國會認為國防部僅考量維持現有規模與預算,而非依外在安全環境與威脅的改變來調整所需兵力結構。因此,國會為因應二十一世紀的威脅及確保美國國家安全利益,通過「1996 年軍力結構總檢法案」,要求國防部配合總統任期執行「四年期國防總檢」及將評估重點予以法制化。鑑於國內學術界對美國「四年期國防總檢」的論述均以報告內容為重點,故本文將從理性決策與戰略規劃面向,來評析美國..

In response to the changes of international security environment and threat in the post-Cold War era, the United States had conducted various comprehensive assessment of its force structure in 1990-1996 periods. However, the Congress pointed out the Department of Defense intended to realign the force structure just from the view of keeping forces size and defense budget and not from the changes of security environment and threat. In order to meet the threats and protect the U.S. national security interests in the twenty-first..

top