期刊內容 Issue content

回列表
從直選總統與民主化談政黨體系變遷：歐洲國家的比較研究
Directly Elected President, Democratization and Party System Change: A Comparative Study on European Countries
沈有忠 (Yu-chung Shen) 陳宥辰 (You-chen Chen)
下載檔案 DOWNLOAD
60卷3期(2021/09/01)

政黨政治向來為研究憲政運作、民主深化的核心議題。過往的研究，多將政黨政治視為影響憲政與民主的自變項，但憲政特性以及民主轉型的過程，也可能系統性的影響政黨體系，對於政黨體系變遷的規模、機率，存在一定的關連性。基於此，本文以政黨體系變遷為依變數，從制度特性以及民主化背景來觀察政黨體系變遷的特性。核心假設有三：首先，就制度特性而言，直選總統的國家，比起議會內閣制的國家，政黨體系變遷的機率較高、規模較大；第二，以選舉時程而言，也是制度面向的因素，在直選總統的國家中，同時選舉或蜜月選舉，因為總統衣尾效應較強，引起國會內政黨體系變遷的機率也較高。此外，因為小黨在總統選舉容易邊緣化，因此同時選舉或蜜月選舉下，小黨泡沫化的機率也較高；第三，非制度面向的部分，從民主化時程與轉型遺緒來看，歐洲國家中，後共轉型的新興民主，相較於歐洲中的老牌民主而言，政黨體系變遷的機率也較高。

Party politics is an important issue to explain the constitutional work and consolidation of a democracy, and especially for newly democracies. If the party system would be affected by different types of constitutional systems and historical legacy, the party system should also be changed. We have three hypotheses: first, we suppose those countries with a directly elected president will have a higher probability for party system change. And the smaller parties are more likely out of parliament. Second, based on the coattail effect, countries with the concurrent election or the honeymoon election will have a higher probability for party system change. Third, the degree of democratization will also be an important variable in measuring party system change. The party system change will have a higher probability in new democracies, such as in Central and Eastern Europe. Therefore, this paper goes to show that among these three hypotheses, directly elected president and electoral timing are institutional variables, while the degree of democratization is historical legacy.
直選總統選舉時程民主化 歐洲 Party System Change Direct Elected President Electoral Timing Democratization European

相關期刊

選舉輸家和贏家的情感極化差異： 政治效能感的調節作用
The Differences of Affective Polarization between Electoral Losers and Winners: The Moderating Role of Political Efficacy
王靖興 (Ching-Hsing Wang)
64卷1期(2025/03/01)

過去研究已指出選舉輸家和贏家在民主滿意度和政治支持上具有顯著的差異，然而卻鮮少有研究檢視選舉輸家和贏家在情感極化的程度上是否有顯著的不同。本研究認為在選舉競爭激烈的情況下，選舉輸家對於勝選者缺乏信心，不信任勝選者會回應其需求，加深其與勝選陣營之間的鴻溝，進而具有較高的情感極化程度。另一方面，選舉贏家則因為處於勝選、掌握政治權力的一方，對於敵對陣營可能較具有包容力，因此會具有較低的情感極化程度。此外，本研究進一步提出選舉輸家/贏家與情感極化之間的關係會受到治效能感的調節作用而產生異質性的影..

Previous research has pointed out significant differences between electoral losers and winners in terms of democratic satisfaction and political support. However, there has been scarce examination of whether there are significant differences in affective polarization between electoral losers and winners. This study argues that in fiercely competitive elections, electoral losers lack confidence in the winners and distrust that their needs will be addressed, deepening the divide between them and the winning camp, and leading to higher levels ..

民主鞏固或崩潰:台灣與俄羅斯之觀察(1995~2005年)
Democratic Consolidation or Breakdown: Observations on Russia and Taiwan (1995~2005)
李酉潭(Yeau-Tarn Lee)
45卷6期(2006/11/01)

台灣與俄羅斯都是在第三波民主化浪潮時，從威權或極權政體走向民主政體的國家。然而，兩國的民主政治發展卻有截然不同的結果。本文的主要目的，乃是在探討 1995 年至 2005 年之間，台灣與俄羅斯在民主發展上的異同。首先，針對民主鞏固之概念作概括性的整理與解釋;其次，說明台灣與俄羅斯民主發展之過程;接著，以民主轉型與民主鞏固的模型，深入比較台灣與俄羅斯民主化進程之差異;最後，則進一步提出台灣邁向民主鞏固與俄羅斯發生民主崩潰的觀察。 &..

Both Taiwan and Russia became democracies during the period of Third Wave of Democratization. However, the results of democratization for each turned out to be completely different. The main purpose of this paper is to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of democratic developments during the period of 1995-2005. The concept of democratic consolidation and relevant ideas is clearly explained in the first section, also showing the process of Taiwan and Russia’s democratic developments. In addition, models of demo..

top