本文主旨在研究國際關係歷史社會學的興起與發展,反思其理論觀點,以及呈現此理論的優勢與未來,促使國內國際關係學者能關注此理論(或研究途徑)。因此,本文第壹部分說明國際關係歷史社會學的流行風潮,以顯現其近年所受到國際關係學者的重視,並約略說明國內相對的情形,以提醒國內國際關係學者關注此理論(或研究途徑)。第貳部分探討國際關係歷史社會學的理論(或研究途徑)發展過程,說明其經過三波的發展階段所關注的重點,尤其是批判主流理論的非歷史性或非歷史主義(ahistoricism)。第參部分探討國際關係歷史社會學轉向全球歷史社會學,主要是由於國際關係的全球性而引發其爭論全球的歷史社會性。第肆部分反思國際關係歷史社會學的若干關鍵議題,以思考其可能的發展趨勢。第伍部分探討國際關係歷史社會學的理論優勢與未來方向,藉以呈現其成為國際關係理論的新展望。
As a reminder for the domestic scholars in International Relations to acquaint to the International Historical Sociology(HIS), this paper aims at researching the development, reflections and prospects of IHS, while analyzing its strengths and future orientations. This paper presents a five-part analysis to reach these aims. The first part describes the popularity of IHS. Though more scholars have paid attentions to it in recent years, the trends in Taiwan have been opposite. This paper drafts a short review and call for International Relations scholars in Taiwan to acknowledge the trend. The second part of this paper examines the development of IHS in order to illustrate the foci of its three-wave development – in particular, the critique of ahistoricism in mainstream International Relations Theory. The third part discusses the shift of IHS toward Global Historical Sociology, which has been a result of debates between historical-social dimensions of globality in International Relations. The fourth part reflects some key issues of IHS and consider its trend of development. The fifth part explores the strengths and future orientations of IHS and assesses its prospects.
當前國際關係理論研究現正面臨著「物質轉向」、「物質主義轉向」、「新物質主義轉向」及「複雜轉向」的風潮,重新掀起國際關係理論的「心-物」、「心-身」、「社會世界-自然世界」、「行為主體性-結構」的爭論,乃至「人類中心-非人類中心」的新爭論。國際關係學者藉由「新物質主義」的哲學觀點提供了實用的哲學基礎而使國際關係或國際系統的本體論爭議迴避或拒絕二元對立觀點,呈現出新的「中間道路」(via media)吸納雙方觀點發展出「不只人類」的觀點,以及物質性也不是僅僅無生..
The field of international relations is facing the fashions of “material turn”, “materialism turn,” “new materialism turn,” and “complexity turn,” which re- raises the new debates of ideal-material, mind-body, social world-natural world, agency-structure, and anthropocentrism-nonanthropocentrism in international relations. With the New Materialism offering a practical philosophical founda- tion, the ontological debates of international relations or international systems could av..
國際系統的理論化是國際關係理論發展的關鍵階段之一,甚至有學者認為國際關係理論研究如同是(國際)系統理論化的傳統。國際關係學者從 1950、60 年代開始進行國際系統的理論化,嘗試建立科學研究的國際系統理論,不同的學者都嘗試藉由其他學科學者的系統理論(systems theory)提出不同的國際系統理論化途徑。國際關係歷史社會學學者歷經三階段的國際系統理論化途徑,第一階段引述歷史社會學學者的國際系統觀點,作為其國際系統理論化及批判新現實主義國際系統理論化的主張..
Theorization of the “international systems” is a critical stage in the development of International Relations Theory(IRT). Some IR scholars even thought that IRT is a tradition of(international)systems-theorization. Since the 1950s and 1960s, IR scholars began to theorize the “international systems” and build a scientific study on international systems theories. Many scholars tried to propose approaches in theorizing the “international systems” through system theories from other disciplines..
請輸入想查詢的期刊標題、關鍵字、作者相關資訊. Please enter the journal title, keywords, and author-related information you want to query.