搜尋結果 Search Result

搜尋結果 : 和" international relations"有關的資料, 共有44筆
「國際關係理論終結」爭論與實踐轉向述評
A Commentary on the Debates of International Relations Theory’s End and Practice Turn Practices
莫大華(Ta-Hua Mo)
65卷3期(2026/09/08)

國際關係理論研究歷經各次大辯論、典範戰爭或典範之間戰爭之後, 學者主張各理論對話與綜合的多元主義,藉以超越各典範與各理論之間的 派別,顯示出國關理論研究的多樣性及綜合性。但國關理論多元主義之 後,不再重視理論檢證而忽視理論建構與發展,引起學者思考與爭論「國 際關係理論終結」與「國際關係研究終結」議題,大理論或普遍理論已不 再是學科知識的核心。 不贊同終結的學者,紛紛提出批評及反駁,主張國關理論未死也沒滅 絕,只是因為學者誤解了理論本..

After the “Great Debates”, “Paradigm Wars” or “Inter-Paradigm Wars”, scholars have suggested the pluralism of dialogues and syntheses among theories to present the diversities and syntheses of International Relations (IR) or International Relations Theory (IRT). Since the pluralism of IRT, theorytesting research has been no longer significant and lack of theory-building and development. Therefore, scholars tried to rethink and debate “The End of IRT” and “The End ..

國際關係政治心理學的發展挑戰與回應:國際關係「情緒轉向」的觀察
The Challenges and Responses of Political Psychology in International Relations: On the “Emotional Turn”
莫大華 (Ta-Hua Mo)
64卷2期(2025/06/30)

1970∼1990年代,政治心理學就已運用於國際關係研究,但2000年起的「情緒轉向」賦予「國際政治心理學」復興的意義與影響,包括學者之間不同觀點的辯論、議題研究的實務價值、國際心理學科際整合研究的發展趨勢與挑戰,以及此轉向對整體國關研究的影響等等,都展現「情緒轉向」正重新帶動國際政治心理學的新進展,遂成為觀察此新進展的關鍵櫥窗,藉由此觀察論析其發展的挑戰與回應。 第壹部分探討國關研究的「情緒轉向 」與政治心理學發展,藉以顯現國關學者應用政治心理學為研究途徑於相關領域及議..

From 1970s to 1990s, Political Psychology has applied to International Relations, but only since 2000, the “emotional turn” empowered International Political Psychology the meaning of revival and impacts. Including the debates between scholars with different perspectives (ontology, epistemology, methodology, and research methods), the practice values of issues study, interdisciplinary trends and challenges of International Political Psychology, and the impacts of “emotional turn”. All demonstrate the “emotional..

研究中國外交還需要國際關係理論嗎?
Do We Still Need International Relations Theory to Study Chinese Foreign Policy?
張廖年仲 (Nien-chung Chang-Liao)
63卷2期(2024/06/01)

近年來國際關係理論面臨可能終結的危機,國際關係理論的三大典範:現實主義、自由主義與建構主義的發展呈現停滯的狀態,理論與政策應用之間的鴻溝也逐漸加深,以中程理論為導向的經驗研究逐漸取代了傳統國際關係理論強調通則化與系統性的分析架構。儘管國際關係理論仍有其重要性,但不論現實主義、自由主義與建構主義皆沒有預測到中國的崛起對國際政治所造成的變化,美國學界也開始反思過去對華交往政策的國際關係理論基礎。就臺灣的研究者而言,隨著從事中國大陸研究的限制增加,研究中國外交是否還能像過去那樣地依賴國際關係理..

In recent years, international relations theory has faced a potential crisis of obsolescence. The development of the three major paradigms—realism, liberalism, and constructivism—has stagnated, and the gap between theory and policy implications has widened. Empirical research guided by middle-range theories are replacing traditional international relations theory that emphasize generalization and systematic frameworks. Although international relations theory remains important, neither realism, liberalism, nor constructivism have..

top