期刊內容 Issue content

回列表
美國戰略清晰化與臺灣避險策略
The United States Strategic Clarity and Taiwan’s Hedging Policy
吳崇涵 (Charles Chong-Han Wu)
下載檔案
64卷3期(2025/09/01)
本研究目的在建立美國傳統戰略模糊與臺灣避險策略間之理論關聯性。主要假設當臺灣從美國獲得較多且明確之安全承諾時，將可能更依賴美國安全保護傘，進而降低自身制定外交政策之自主與靈活性。過去數十年，華盛頓持續且長期的安全承諾，即有可能限制臺灣的避險策略選擇。本研究的實證證據，主要探討川普與拜登政府任內，華府戰略模糊逐漸轉變為戰略清晰下，臺北在美中兩強之間的外交政策。此外，藉由將避險的理論「模型化」，並區別避險與樞紐的關係，是本文另一個研究貢獻。
The study aims to establish a theoretical connection between strategic ambiguity and hedging policy. The assumption is that as Taiwan receives more security assurance and clarity from the United States, it may rely more on the U.S. security umbrella, reducing its autonomy and flexibility in crafting its foreign policy. Over time, consistent and prolonged security commitments from the United States could limit Taiwan’s hedging options, as it increasingly aligns with the U.S. position. The empirical evidence in this article explores how shifting from strategic ambiguity to clarity during Trump and Biden’s administrations, and compares various factors, including domestic politics, regional dynamics, and international developments, will shape Taiwan’s approach in a contested and complex geopolitical landscape.
In addition, Taiwan’s hedging strategy has weakened as the United States has shifted from strategic ambiguity to strategic clarity. Will the hedging behavior at other levels also be affected? With the widespread application of big data and artificial intelligence, the United States is gradually paying attention to its demand for high-end chips. As Taiwan has played the major role in the global chip supply chain, facing the intensification of the technology war between the United States and China, this project aims to provide theoretical and empirical materials on the role Taiwan faces in the technology field.

 

戰略模糊 避險 臺美關係 外交政策 川普主義 Strategic Ambiguity Hedging US-Taiwan Relation Foreign Policy Trumpism

相關期刊

索羅門群島外交政策中的「避險」意涵探析
An Analysis of the “Hedging” Implications in the Foreign Policy of the Solomon Islands
張凱銘 (Kai-Ming Chang)
64卷3期(2025/09/01)

作為太平洋島國地區成員之一的索羅門群島，近年和美國、中國、澳洲等國家皆往來密切，成為各方積極拉攏的合作對象，其外交動向備受國際社會矚目。本文運用國際關係研究中的「避險戰略」分析索羅門群島外交政策，該戰略建議現代國家面臨利害交錯的複雜情境時，宜跳脫傳統的「平衡／扈從」二分思維，改以雙向投注作法同時迴避安全損害及利益損失風險。研究結果顯示索羅門群島雖是發展程度低落且國內情勢不穩的小型島國，卻能在美中競逐的混沌局面中靈活遊走，同步交好各方以擴大外部援助、增進國家安全並提升國際地位，其外交施政體..

As a member of the Pacific Islands region, the Solomon Islands has developed close ties with countries such as the United States, China, and Australia in recent years, making itself an actively courted partner of relevant countries, its diplomatic orientation therefore attracted the attention of the international community. This article used the “hedging strategy” in international relations studies to analyze the foreign policy of the Solomon Islands. The research of “hedging strategy” suggests modern countries shoul..

「避險」考量下的歐中關係： 「歐俄之間的外交歧異」如何影響 「歐洲各國與中國之間的合作與衝突」
Europe-China Relations Under the Logic of Hedging: How “Diplomatic Divergences Between Europe and Russia” Shape “Cooperation and Conflict Between European Countries and China”
薛健吾 (Chien-Wu Alex Hsueh)
64卷3期(2025/09/01)

本文研究同時具有「北約組織」和「歐盟」會員國身分的歐洲國家與中國之間的關係。同時具有這兩個會員國身分的國家，除了是歐洲「最為民主」和「最具安全保障」的國家之外，也因為須配合這兩個國際建制的官方立場，因而在理論上應該要對中國採取方向一致的經濟、外交和安全政策。然而，近年來，隨著「美國對中政策的轉變」、「歐盟在移民和經濟議題上的分裂」，以及「北約組織各國在安全議題上的分歧」，中國對歐洲國家「分而治之」的爭議也浮上檯面。在經濟和安全皆有保障的情況之下，是否有什麼系統性的因素可以解釋歐洲各國與中..

This paper examines the relationships between China and the European countries that hold dual membership in both NATO and EU. These countries, being among the most democratic and secure in Europe, are theoretically expected to adopt consistent economic, diplomatic, and security policies toward China in line with the official positions of these two international institutions. However, in recent years, shifts in U.S. policy towards China, divisions within the EU on migration and economic issues, and security disagreements within NATO have bro..

top