搜尋結果 Search Result

搜尋結果 : 和"印度"有關的資料, 共有12筆
日印特別戰略夥伴關係: 新形態的戰略合作關係
A Special Strategic Partnership between Japan and India: New Patterns of Strategic Cooperation
林賢參(Hsien-Sen Lin)
即將出版
60卷2期(2021/06/01)

本文檢視2005年以降日印兩國建構在外交、經濟、與防衛等領域合作的制度化過程,是否意味著將邁向同盟關係發展。日印兩國與中共之間分別存在著領土主權爭議,再加上中共積極擴大在印太區域的軍事存在,平衡中共威脅成為日印發展戰略合作的重要動機。2014年9月,日印將兩國戰略合作關係提升為「特別戰略性全球夥伴關係」,勾勒出雙方戰略合作 的路線圖,以共同發展印太區域的自由、開放、繁榮,以及確保印太海洋的交通線安全。不過,受限於國內共識與軍事實力不足,以及擔憂中共採取反制措施,短期內日印兩國不可..

This article examines the institutionalized development of diplomatic, economic, and defense cooperation between Japan and India since 2005, and whether or not both countries will move toward an alliance. To clarify further, Japan and India have disputes over territorial sovereignty with China, and China has actively expanded its military presence in the Indo-Pacific region. Thus, balancing China’s threats has become an important motive for Japan- India to develop strategic cooperation. Since September 2014, Japan and India have promo..

21世紀中國與印度競合模式分析
A Study of Competition-Cooperation Between India and China in the 21st Century
陳純如(Chun-Ju Chen)
即將出版
57卷2期(2018/06/01)

本文從決策者角度探討中印關係中的競合模式。中印在國際間先後崛起之際,兩國之間充滿競爭與合作,且往往競爭多於合作。中印之間的競合模式多半是一種策略合作,進行務實的交往但保有平衡選擇。競合的時機取決於決策者對於議題相關成本與利益的考量。決策者希望在重要議題上合作,擱置爭議,為經濟發展創造一個和平的環境,但是保持可啟動平衡行動的選擇,作為避險。不過,因為缺乏互信,以及決策者面對的政治風險,有時策略合作中原本是備而不用的平衡選擇被啟動。例如,在 2013 ..

This article studies the competition-cooperation model between China and India from the perspective of decision-makers. While China and India experience fast economic growths, there are inevitably competition and cooperation between the two. The choice to cooperate or compete depends on how the decision-makers perceive the interest structure of the engagement of the two countries on issues. However, oftentime it is not easy to judge whether the two countries are in a zero-sum or non-zero sum game on one issue. “Strategi..

印巴、僧泰的多元衝突分析與方法評議
Multiconflict Analysis of India-Pakistan, Sinhala-Tamil, and Rethinking Analytic Methods
張育銓(Yu-Chuan Chang)
即將出版
49卷3期(2010/06/01)

討論殖民議題時,有學者指出,殖民者利用多族群的對立,採取「分而治之」的政策,以達到殖民目的;也有學者以「雙重使命」的角度,認為殖民者在殖民地不僅從事破壞,也執行建設,不該遺漏或偏頗其中一項。筆者認為,這兩種對殖民政策的分析方式,容易陷入殖民論述中常見的二分法困境,將殖民者採用「分而治之」的策略,認為是殖民者掌握殖民地的族群對立之後的理性計算,或是無法加以治理族群對立而不得不的退讓,而「雙重使命」則可能合理化殖民政策與忽略不同殖民地的特性。因此,本文質疑以「分..

Of colonial topics, a lot of scholars indicate that colonizers exploited the opposition in different races and enforced the tactics of Divide-and-Rule for the colonial purposes. Another school of scholars, based on the Dual Mandate approach, indicates that colonizers not just destroy but construct the colony as well. The article considers two approaches that led to the dilemma of colonial discourses especially on dichotomy - Divide-and-Rule, which leads to either colonizers controlling the characteristic of conflicts between ..

區域研究之下的南亞視野-從美國學院體制中南亞研究的發展與困境談起
Area Studies as an Interdisciplinary Approach to Understand South Asia: The Evolution and Challenges of South Asian Studies in American Academy
張世澤(Shih-Tse Chang)張世強(Shih-Chiang Chang)
即將出版
47卷1期(2008/03/01)

第二次世界大戰之後,現代南亞研究開始現身於美國學界,儘管其受到區域研究跨學科典範的影響,但卻仍未能完全擺脫東方學和印度學所積累下來的濃厚古典主義色彩,並在幾所領銜區域研究的重點大學院校中,形成獨樹一格的南亞研究傳統,著重於非功利取向的人文式理解;唯在受到一系列知識性與制度性的質疑和挑戰之後,隨著區域研究本身面臨學科紀律的重組與反省,過去對於南亞問題的研究視野,也開始出現許多檢討與轉變。在本文的討論中,我們便將透過南亞研究在美國學界發展軌跡的回顧與檢討,描繪區..

The establishing of South Asian studies in America during the decades following the WWII marked an important shift in the study of South Asia from Oriental studies and Indology towards an interdisciplinary area studies approach which tried to treat this area as objects of social sciences and humanities. During the ensuing decade, the earnest scholarship begun with the leading universities, such as the University of Chicago, University of Pennsylvania; all fostered new projects focused on South Asia. They had emphasized study ..

top