南南投資在全球外資中的比重在本世紀出現大幅成長。在南南投資被寄望成為促進南方國家經濟發展新動力的同時，挑戰與問題也接連產生。本研究目的在探討南南投資於南南合作下的意義與南方國家對此投資引發的國家安全之外資政策回應。本文作為探討南南投資與其引發南方國家國安風險之外資政策回應的介紹導論性論文，目的在經由闡釋南南投資的涵義與特性，分析南南投資與國家安全的關聯，再提出初步的理論解釋說明南方國家對此類外資引發之國安疑慮的外資政策回應，並輔以相關案例分析說明，以作為後續..

The South-South investment has increased dramatically in the 21st century. It has been anticipated to promote South Countries’ economic development, while related problems and challenges remain. The goal of this essay is to explore the significance of South-South investment in the context of South-South Cooperation, and the South Countries’ policy responses to national security risk over South-South investment. This article is designed to be an introductory essay, with a moderate goal of illustrating th..

歐洲歷經兩極體系瓦解與區域整合不斷推進的國際局勢，處在歐洲大陸的眾多國家各自發展出不同的安全策略、採取多種途徑保障本身國家安全，我們認為歐洲國家的安全策略選擇有其路徑可循，本文著重討論此種策略選擇的因素分析。在案例揀選上，本文特別著重歐洲中小型國家安全策略選擇，這主要是因為過去相當長的時間國際關係學多著重於大國安全研究，對中小型國家重視程度仍有待提升，因此本文擬從中小型國家著手，分析這一群國家安全策略選擇。 在安全策略選擇模式建立上，本..

The European continent has been free of great wars since the end of Cold War. This article assesses security studies in international relations by focusing on middle ground states’ strategic choices in relation to great powers. We argue that Small and Medium States(SMSs)widespread in Eastern Europe, Balkan Peninsula and South Caucasus have their strategic calculations in shaping their security choices. The article posits that the decision-making process of SMSs’ security policies rests upon differentiated and cros..

美國為因應後冷戰時期國際安全環境與威脅的改變，至 1996 年止已執行多次全面性的兵力結構檢討。然而，國會認為國防部僅考量維持現有規模與預算，而非依外在安全環境與威脅的改變來調整所需兵力結構。因此，國會為因應二十一世紀的威脅及確保美國國家安全利益，通過「1996 年軍力結構總檢法案」，要求國防部配合總統任期執行「四年期國防總檢」及將評估重點予以法制化。鑑於國內學術界對美國「四年期國防總檢」的論述均以報告內容為重點，故本文將從理性決策與戰略規劃面向，來評析美國..

In response to the changes of international security environment and threat in the post-Cold War era, the United States had conducted various comprehensive assessment of its force structure in 1990-1996 periods. However, the Congress pointed out the Department of Defense intended to realign the force structure just from the view of keeping forces size and defense budget and not from the changes of security environment and threat. In order to meet the threats and protect the U.S. national security interests in the twenty-first..