各期期刊 All issues

永續投資國際架構之建構: 以歐盟企業永續盡職調查指令與WTO貿易 便捷化協定為借鏡
Establishing an International Framework of Sustainable FDI: Lessons from EU CSDDD and WTO TFA
高啟中 (Chi-Chung Kao) 羅至美 (Chih-Mei Luo)
64卷4期(2025/12/18)

永續發展是近年國際社會共同關注與致力推動的重大議題,在世界貿易組織(WTO)成員國推動下,投資便捷化與發展協定(IFDA)草案於2024年第13屆部長會議(MC13)提出。IFDA的重點規範包括推動投資措施的便捷化與投資人遵循負責任的企業行(RBC),惟IFDA僅要求成員國鼓勵投資人自願採行RBC國際規範,欠缺具體獎勵誘因與制裁機制,成效存疑,作為推動永續發展的國際規範架構,顯有不足。本文認為應仿效WTO貿易便捷化協定(TFA)的授權營運商機制,於IFDA增訂永續投資人認證(RSI)制度..

Sustainable development has become a major issue for the international community in recent years. A great number of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Members proposed a draft of the Investment Facilitation and Development Agreement (IFDA) at the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) in 2024, but not accepted. IFDA’s key provisions include facilitating investment measures and encouraging investors to adhere to responsible business conduct (RBC). However, the IFDA only encourages ‘voluntary adoption’ of international RBC norms..

歐盟印太經濟協定中的規範性權力運作: 歐越自由貿易協定與歐中全面投資協定之比較
EU’s Operation of Normative Power in Economic Agreements in the Indo-Pacific Region: Comparison of the EUVFTA and the EU-China CAI
賴昀辰 (Yun-Chen Lai)
64卷4期(2025/12/18)

本研究探索造成《歐盟—越南自由貿易協定》(EUVFTA)和《歐盟—中國全面投資協定》(EU-China CAI)不同結果的影響因素。歐越自貿協定及歐中投資協定皆將永續發展及勞工權利等貿易永續願景納入歐盟貿易政策,亦即兩者皆為歐盟所謂的新世代經貿協定。然而在實務上,兩項協定命運卻有很大的差異。本研究透過現實主義、自由主義和社會建構主義三大國際關係主流理論,探索影響兩個協定發展的戰略、制度和意識形態因素。本文認為,儘管理念上的規範性力量有其重要性,但戰略夥伴關係、既存..

This thesis investigates the differing results of the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EUVFTA) and the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI). Both agreements are designed to embed sustainability and labor rights within the EU’s trade policies. By applying realism, liberalism, and social constructivism, the study examines the strategic, institutional, and ideological elements that impact these agreements. It is posited that although normative power is essential, practical factors concerning strategic partnerships, instit..

「橋接」數位分歧: 歐盟在印太數位治理中的角色
“Bridging” Digital Divides: The EU’s Role in Indo-Pacific Digital Governance
張詠詠 (Yung-Yung Chang)
64卷4期(2025/12/18)

在科技快速發展的時代,數位領域已成為地緣政治競爭的核心,重塑全球治理、安全與經濟格局。美中日益激烈的科技競爭正在加速全球數位秩序的分化,其核心問題在於全球網路治理規範的分歧,反映出不同價值觀與政策優先事項的對立。在此背景下,印太地區憑藉其經濟潛力與科技創新能力,成為推動數位轉型與治理的關鍵戰場。 除了美中競爭,歐盟(EU)作為全球規範性權力(Normative Power Europe, NPE),也試圖在印太地區的數位秩序中發揮影響。然而,相較於美國以市場驅動(market-d..

In an era of rapid technological advancement, the digital domain has become a core battleground for geopolitical competition, reshaping global governance, security, and economic structures. The intensifying U.S.-China technological rivalry is accelerating the fragmentation of the global digital order, with the key challenge being the divergence in global cyber governance norms, reflecting conflicting values and policy priorities. Against this backdrop, the Indo-Pacific region, with its economic potential and technological innovation capacit..

規範性權力仍然有效?理論分析與我國製造業問卷對歐盟產業政策的回應
Is Normative Power Still Valid? Theoretical Explanations and the Responses of Taiwan’s Manufacturing to the EU’s Industrial Policies
葉國俊 (Kuo-Chun Yeh) 陳馨蕙 (Shin-Hui Chen)
64卷4期(2025/12/18)

歐盟「規範性權力」(Normative Power)概念源自歐盟東擴計畫,檢視歐盟堅持普世價值並藉以推行各項對外政策成果,多著眼於法政與自由貿易協議而產業政策較為少見,因為歐盟產業政策本是新近議題。本文建構一個歐盟同時追求既有價值原則,同時面對近期經濟安全去風險趨勢與追求經濟繁榮的「不可能三角」理論,說明目前面對地緣政治與供應鏈變動衝擊,兼以成員國立場不一致下,堅持「規範性權力」推行普世價值難度增加,將提升歐盟政策選擇的不確定性。我們以臺灣製造業上市櫃公司問卷結果進行驗證,證明歐盟以價值..

“Normative Power” originates from the EU's enlargement, emphasizing the commitment to universal values and its achievements in implementing various foreign policies. This concept mainly focuses on legal-political matters and free trade agreements, while industrial policy is less prominent, as it is a relatively recent issue for the EU. This paper constructs a theoretical framework of the “impossible trinity,” wherein the EU simultaneously pursues its established value principles, addresses recent trends in econom..

複雜式避險策略研究:立陶宛、匈牙利與土耳其的安全策略選擇
The Study of Complex Hedging Strategies: Security Policy Choices of Lithuania, Hungary, and Turkey
楊三億 (San-Yi Yang)
64卷3期(2025/09/01)

中小型國家在當前國際體系下的數目眾多,這些國家有各自國家利益與偏好,因此理解這群國家的策略選擇可以更全面地了解國際關係發展。本文研究設計有以下幾個特色:第一,本文以歐洲的中小型國家為個案研究標的,擇立陶宛、匈牙利與土耳其三國進行分析,這三國分別位於當前東/西歐對立環境的最前沿,透過觀察這些國家可理解地緣斷層帶上中小型國家面對歐、俄強權競爭時的策略選擇。第二,由於中國近年不斷向歐洲拋射影響力,歐洲國家明顯感受到中國政策影響,歐洲的中小型國家傳統上面對歐/俄兩強環境已出現變化,由於中國不斷崛..

Small and medium-sized states constitute a substantial portion of the contemporary international system. These states possess distinct national interests and preferences; hence, examining their strategic choices provides a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics of international relations. This study is characterized by several key features. First, it focuses on European small and medium-sized states through the case studies of Lithuania, Hungary, and Turkey. These countries are situated on the geopolitical frontlines of the current East..

top