2007-08 年爆發全球金融危機後,美聯準會(Fed)實施三輪的量化寬鬆貨幣(QE)政策以支持金融穩定與刺激經濟成長。Fed 的 QE 政策導致美元貶值,這意味持有過半美國債券作為儲備貨幣之外國官方機構(Foreign Official Institutions, FOIs),其國債部位將產生巨大之資本損失。強調新自由主義世界秩序重要性之國際政治經濟學文獻,在論述金融全球化時指出, Fed 的銀行紓困計畫對其他經濟體形成非意圖性之資本流動的外溢效果。藉由 Foucault 對權力概念之見解,本文主張 Fed 為因應金融危機所展現之政策行為,凸顯美國有意識地行使其獨特之「結構性金融權力」來奪取他國財富。本文將焦點置放於美國國債之投資績效上,以便探究 Fed 的 QE 政策對世界其他經濟體之影響。透過上述資料分析,本文對以下行為提出解釋:儘管理解美國可能透過通貨膨脹手段來降低其國債價值,為何 FOIs 仍持續累積以美元計價之債券?
In the wake of the global financial crisis that struck the world in 2007- 08, the U.S. Federal Reserve(the Fed)has undertaken three rounds of quantitative easing(QE)in an effort to sustain financial stability and stimulate economic growth. However, the Fed’s QE policy inevitably resulted in dollar depreciation, which means a huge capital loss for foreign official institutions ( FOIs ) since FOIs hold more than half of the outstanding stock of U.S. Treasury securities as official reserve holdings. Existing International Political Economy literature on financial globalization, which emphasizes the importance of neoliberal world order understanding, suggests that the Fed’s bank bailout strategy has large unintended spillover effects on capital flows to other economies. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s understanding of power, it can be argued that the Fed’s response to the financial crisis highlighted the deliberate and unique “structural financial power” of the U.S. to deprive other countries of their wealth. Accordingly, this paper explores the impacts of the Fed’s QE policies on other economies, with concentration on the investment performance of the Treasury securities. In so doing, it hopefully offers an explanation for why FOIs continued purchasing large amounts of dollar-denominated securities in the QE period despite the fact that the U.S. action would devalue their holdings of Treasury bonds.
北京倡議的「亞洲基礎設施投資銀行」(簡稱:亞投行),在華府眼中,卻認為會挑戰到當今美國主導的全球經濟秩序。事實上,資本額度僅 1000 億美元的亞投行,無法撼動美國在全球金融政治中的主導地位。美國對亞投行戒慎恐懼,真是美元的地位受到威脅?亞投行的設立是否真能實踐人民幣國際化的目標?本文主張,中國應支持亞投行以美元發行(而非人民幣計價) 的「亞投行債券」,並同時設立「帶路基金」發行人民幣計價的「帶路基金債券」。如此,中國才得逐步降低對美國國債的過度依賴,掌握到..
Beijing launched the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank(AIIB)in order to offer financial resources for more investments to Asian countries in need. To some extent, the US$ 100 billion AIIB is not supposed to impose any serious threat to U.S. dominance in global finance. Why does the U.S. fear the China-led AIIB? Would the establishment of AIIB speed up decline of the dollar as an international currency? Is the AIIB likely to contribute to further internationalization of the renminbi(RMB)? This paper contends that China shou..
請輸入想查詢的期刊標題、關鍵字、作者相關資訊. Please enter the journal title, keywords, and author-related information you want to query.