本文主旨在研究國際關係歷史社會學的興起與發展,反思其理論觀點,以及呈現此理論的優勢與未來,促使國內國際關係學者能關注此理論(或研究途徑)。因此,本文第壹部分說明國際關係歷史社會學的流行風潮,以顯現其近年所受到國際關係學者的重視,並約略說明國內相對的情形,以提醒國內國際關係學者關注此理論(或研究途徑)。第貳部分探討國際關係歷史社會學的理論(或研究途徑)發展過程,說明其經過三波的發展階段所關注的重點,尤其是批判主流理論的非歷史性或非歷史主義(ahistoricism)。第參部分探討國際關係歷史社會學轉向全球歷史社會學,主要是由於國際關係的全球性而引發其爭論全球的歷史社會性。第肆部分反思國際關係歷史社會學的若干關鍵議題,以思考其可能的發展趨勢。第伍部分探討國際關係歷史社會學的理論優勢與未來方向,藉以呈現其成為國際關係理論的新展望。
As a reminder for the domestic scholars in International Relations to acquaint to the International Historical Sociology(HIS), this paper aims at researching the development, reflections and prospects of IHS, while analyzing its strengths and future orientations. This paper presents a five-part analysis to reach these aims. The first part describes the popularity of IHS. Though more scholars have paid attentions to it in recent years, the trends in Taiwan have been opposite. This paper drafts a short review and call for International Relations scholars in Taiwan to acknowledge the trend. The second part of this paper examines the development of IHS in order to illustrate the foci of its three-wave development – in particular, the critique of ahistoricism in mainstream International Relations Theory. The third part discusses the shift of IHS toward Global Historical Sociology, which has been a result of debates between historical-social dimensions of globality in International Relations. The fourth part reflects some key issues of IHS and consider its trend of development. The fifth part explores the strengths and future orientations of IHS and assesses its prospects.
做為國際關係學門當中安全研究重要項目之一的「歐洲安全」,在經由冷戰時期與後冷戰時期的理論辯證與政策實踐進程,已成為相關領域的重要範例。本文將有系統的以區域安全、國際關係、全球體系三個不同層次面向理論當中各自所屬的理性主義與非理性主義做為理論架構,檢驗歐洲安全分別在冷戰與後冷戰時期的發展,以了解各理論的解釋效度與適用性。由本研究對於歐洲安全的交叉檢驗可以發現,冷戰時期以權力為安全關係核心,形成了長期區域集團對抗的國際雙極體系,因此,上述三個層次的理論當中的理性..
The dynamic development of European security in both theoretical debate and policy practice has made its research a momentous model in the field of security studies. This article aims at exploring various theoretical structures of European security by systematically examining both rationalism and non-rationalism in regional security, international relations theories, and global systems. Core issues of focus are allocated at three levels. The article applies a theoretical basis to the volatile evolution of European security du..
當前國際關係理論研究現正面臨著「物質轉向」、「物質主義轉向」、「新物質主義轉向」及「複雜轉向」的風潮,重新掀起國際關係理論的「心-物」、「心-身」、「社會世界-自然世界」、「行為主體性-結構」的爭論,乃至「人類中心-非人類中心」的新爭論。國際關係學者藉由「新物質主義」的哲學觀點提供了實用的哲學基礎而使國際關係或國際系統的本體論爭議迴避或拒絕二元對立觀點,呈現出新的「中間道路」(via media)吸納雙方觀點發展出「不只人類」的觀點,以及物質性也不是僅僅無生..
The field of international relations is facing the fashions of “material turn”, “materialism turn,” “new materialism turn,” and “complexity turn,” which re- raises the new debates of ideal-material, mind-body, social world-natural world, agency-structure, and anthropocentrism-nonanthropocentrism in international relations. With the New Materialism offering a practical philosophical founda- tion, the ontological debates of international relations or international systems could av..
請輸入想查詢的期刊標題、關鍵字、作者相關資訊. Please enter the journal title, keywords, and author-related information you want to query.