國際關係理論研究歷經各次大辯論、典範戰爭或典範之間戰爭之後, 學者主張各理論對話與綜合的多元主義,藉以超越各典範與各理論之間的 派別,顯示出國關理論研究的多樣性及綜合性。但國關理論多元主義之 後,不再重視理論檢證而忽視理論建構與發展,引起學者思考與爭論「國 際關係理論終結」與「國際關係研究終結」議題,大理論或普遍理論已不 再是學科知識的核心。 不贊同終結的學者,紛紛提出批評及反駁,主張國關理論未死也沒滅 絕,只是因為學者誤解了理論本..
After the “Great Debates”, “Paradigm Wars” or “Inter-Paradigm Wars”, scholars have suggested the pluralism of dialogues and syntheses among theories to present the diversities and syntheses of International Relations (IR) or International Relations Theory (IRT). Since the pluralism of IRT, theorytesting research has been no longer significant and lack of theory-building and development. Therefore, scholars tried to rethink and debate “The End of IRT” and “The End ..
做為國際關係學門當中安全研究重要項目之一的「歐洲安全」,在經由冷戰時期與後冷戰時期的理論辯證與政策實踐進程,已成為相關領域的重要範例。本文將有系統的以區域安全、國際關係、全球體系三個不同層次面向理論當中各自所屬的理性主義與非理性主義做為理論架構,檢驗歐洲安全分別在冷戰與後冷戰時期的發展,以了解各理論的解釋效度與適用性。由本研究對於歐洲安全的交叉檢驗可以發現,冷戰時期以權力為安全關係核心,形成了長期區域集團對抗的國際雙極體系,因此,上述三個層次的理論當中的理性..
The dynamic development of European security in both theoretical debate and policy practice has made its research a momentous model in the field of security studies. This article aims at exploring various theoretical structures of European security by systematically examining both rationalism and non-rationalism in regional security, international relations theories, and global systems. Core issues of focus are allocated at three levels. The article applies a theoretical basis to the volatile evolution of European security du..
請輸入想查詢的期刊標題、關鍵字、作者相關資訊. Please enter the journal title, keywords, and author-related information you want to query.