The specific strategies employed by a hegemon in dealing with rising powers are a crucial aspect of understanding the power competition between the United States and China. International relations paradigms have been influenced by the notion of the inevitable decline of hegemonic power, often disregarding the fact that a hegemon is a product of international-level efforts in science and technological innovation. This article aims to delineate the significance of technological innovation in maintaining global dominance for a hegemon with the leadership long cycles theory. It presents an analytical framework to examine how a hegemon addresses the challenge posed by rising powers aiming to catch up in technological innovation. The analysis delves into the varied aspects of the United States' responses to threats posed by technological advancements from the Soviet Union and Japan during the Cold War. It identifies measures adopted by the United States, such as export controls, self-strengthening, self-reinforcement, containment, and absorption, particularly in critical emerging high-tech sectors, in an effort to impede China's progress in technological innovation. The article concludes that the efficacy of export-control measures in stalling China's technological advancements is not substantial. Looking ahead, the ability of the United States to control crucial nodes in the technological innovation network, rally support from its allies, and drive domestic technological innovations will pose a significant challenge to its sustained hegemony.
霸權擁有生產高附加價值與高科技商品的獨佔地位,加之次等國單方依賴霸權商品,塑成霸權使用非暴力的經濟脅迫(economic coercion)措施,施壓目標國,以達到「不戰而屈人之兵」的戰略、政治與經貿目標。鴉片戰爭前,清帝國多次採取「封關」等貿易脅迫措施,禁絕茶葉出口,迫使英國等互市外夷屈服讓步,強化清帝國的經濟脅迫習慣(habit)。國際關係與外交決策的觀點,多批判清政府決策菁英的自大無知,或是強調滿清政權的朝貢制度天朝思維,而少有省思,清政府採取「封關」脅迫措施的決策過程,以及造成清..
Hegemons possess a monopolistic position in producing high-value-addedand high-tech goods, coupled with the unilateral dependence of subordinate states on these products. This dynamic enables hegemons to employ non-violent economic coercion to pressure target states, achieving strategic, political, andeconomic objectives aligned with the principle of “winning without fighting”. Before the Opium War, the Qing Empire frequently adopted trade coercion measures, such as “closing borders”, to ban tea exports and force..
請輸入想查詢的期刊標題、關鍵字、作者相關資訊. Please enter the journal title, keywords, and author-related information you want to query.