近年臺灣學界常有對「中國研究」方法與議程的改進呼聲,本文試圖介紹日本國關學界的中國研究,提供本土中國研究及發展之參考點。本文主要 討論「中國研究」在學科定位與學科史上,以什麼樣的方式演變?而在日本國際關係的主要社群中,「中國研究議程」呈現什麼樣的特色?本文以「日本國際政治學會」所編輯刊物國際政治為核心,對其中的中國研究相關論文加以分析並歸類。時間範圍是 1957-2008 年,討論二戰結束後,日本國際政治學界對於中國的研究方法、研究觀點、主要研究成果之系譜。並以其中的專論、研究筆記為核心研究材料,佐以其他重要著作與當時學界大事加以說明。
結果顯示,雖然主要占多數的中國研究成果屬於「國際政治史」,但近年來「區域研究」的篇數增加,漸有並駕齊驅之勢;同時「理論研究」研究也穩定發展中。其次不論是國際政治史與區域研究,都在引進西方理論的同時,保有傳統研究方式,呈現辯證發展的變化。
Currently, there has been an increasing voice to reconsider the methodology and agenda of “China studies” within the Taiwanese academic community. With this respect, this paper introduces the China studies achieved by the Japanese academic community to support the developmental basis of China studies in Taiwan. Two questions lead the argument in this paper:(1)what is the transformation of the contemporary China studies in the Japanese international relations(IR)community? and(2)what characteristics are presented from the China studies agenda within their IR field? This paper analyzes and categorizes China studies publications written in the Kokusaiseiji(IR), edited by the Japan Association of International Relations(JAIR), in order to answer the two aforementioned questions. The time scope of publications and research notes spans from 1957 to 2008, and can be embodied to present Japan’s perspectives on the China studies methodology, opinion, and genealogy, especially after the end of World War II. In addition, some relevant books and major social events in Japan are demonstrated as well for discussion.
This paper shows that most of Japan’s China studies publications can be described as the works of “international political history,” and that the amount of publications focusing on “area studies” is increased recently to the level comparable to the former area. During such transformation, the study of “IR Theory” is steadily developing as well in Japan. Moreover, this paper finds that the Japanese style of dialectics in both international political history and area studies research are consisted of Western element but also retain the traditional mode of the IR theories.
日本的世界觀核心──「亞洲學」(アジア研究,包括東洋學、東亞學等概念)作為日本近代發展的關鍵性思想,對於日本國族的建立起了關鍵性的作用。亞洲學從戰前對「中國學」的衍生物,戰後因為軍事色彩,亞洲學在日本中國學界中長期無聲,而現在卻是日本用以與世界對話的重要基礎概念。本文藉由對日本思想界中亞洲學所承載的觀念的研究,整理作為思想系譜的亞洲學歷史,用以說明戰後亞洲學呈現的特色以及與戰前亞洲學的不同。亞洲學的系譜有三點核心意識:作為日本民族自身的投射;作為日本藉以對..
Japan’s core weltanschauung, “Asian Studies”, as keywords in Japanese philosophy during recent development, has an instrumental effect on the establishment of the Nation of Japan. Asian Studies evolved from China Studies after the War. As the military did not have an influence on Japan’s China Studies after the War, it is now an important basis for Japan’s conversation with the rest of the world. This article intends to produce a genealogy of Japan’s Asian Studies to explore the characteris..
第二次世界大戰之後,現代南亞研究開始現身於美國學界,儘管其受到區域研究跨學科典範的影響,但卻仍未能完全擺脫東方學和印度學所積累下來的濃厚古典主義色彩,並在幾所領銜區域研究的重點大學院校中,形成獨樹一格的南亞研究傳統,著重於非功利取向的人文式理解;唯在受到一系列知識性與制度性的質疑和挑戰之後,隨著區域研究本身面臨學科紀律的重組與反省,過去對於南亞問題的研究視野,也開始出現許多檢討與轉變。在本文的討論中,我們便將透過南亞研究在美國學界發展軌跡的回顧與檢討,描繪區..
The establishing of South Asian studies in America during the decades following the WWII marked an important shift in the study of South Asia from Oriental studies and Indology towards an interdisciplinary area studies approach which tried to treat this area as objects of social sciences and humanities. During the ensuing decade, the earnest scholarship begun with the leading universities, such as the University of Chicago, University of Pennsylvania; all fostered new projects focused on South Asia. They had emphasized study ..
請輸入想查詢的期刊標題、關鍵字、作者相關資訊. Please enter the journal title, keywords, and author-related information you want to query.