期刊內容 Issue content

回列表
規範性權力仍然有效？理論分析與我國製造業問卷對歐盟產業政策的回應
Is Normative Power Still Valid? Theoretical Explanations and the Responses of Taiwan’s Manufacturing to the EU’s Industrial Policies
葉國俊 (Kuo-Chun Yeh) 陳馨蕙 (Shin-Hui Chen)
下載檔案
64卷4期(2025/12/18)
歐盟「規範性權力」（Normative Power）概念源自歐盟東擴計畫，檢視歐盟堅持普世價值並藉以推行各項對外政策成果，多著眼於法政與自由貿易協議而產業政策較為少見，因為歐盟產業政策本是新近議題。本文建構一個歐盟同時追求既有價值原則，同時面對近期經濟安全去風險趨勢與追求經濟繁榮的「不可能三角」理論，說明目前面對地緣政治與供應鏈變動衝擊，兼以成員國立場不一致下，堅持「規範性權力」推行普世價值難度增加，將提升歐盟政策選擇的不確定性。我們以臺灣製造業上市櫃公司問卷結果進行驗證，證明歐盟以價值包裝但遂行特定產業目標的政策，影響力雖仍不及美、中但已屬前所未有。然而實質內容朝自利傾斜的政策能否被計入「規範性權力」效果，有待進一步討論。
“Normative Power” originates from the EU's enlargement, emphasizing the commitment to universal values and its achievements in implementing various foreign policies. This concept mainly focuses on legal-political matters and free trade agreements, while industrial policy is less prominent, as it is a relatively recent issue for the EU. This paper constructs a theoretical framework of the “impossible trinity,” wherein the EU simultaneously pursues its established value principles, addresses recent trends in economic security and de-risking, and seeks economic prosperity. Given the current geopolitical landscape and disruptions in supply chains, along with the inconsistency in member states’positions, maintaining “Normative Power” and promoting universal values have
been increasingly challenging, thereby adding uncertainty to the EU’s policy choices. Using survey results from publicly listed Taiwanese manufacturing companies, we validate that while the EU employs value-based narratives to pursue specific industrial policy goals, its influence, though still trailing behind the U.S. and China, is unprecedented. However, whether policies that lean toward self-interest can still be considered an effect of “normative power” would need further discussions.
規範性權力 產業政策 臺灣製造業 半導體產業 歐盟 Normative Power Industrial Policy Taiwan’s Manufacturing Semiconductor EU

相關期刊

「橋接」數位分歧： 歐盟在印太數位治理中的角色
“Bridging” Digital Divides: The EU’s Role in Indo-Pacific Digital Governance
張詠詠 (Yung-Yung Chang)
64卷4期(2025/12/18)

在科技快速發展的時代，數位領域已成為地緣政治競爭的核心，重塑全球治理、安全與經濟格局。美中日益激烈的科技競爭正在加速全球數位秩序的分化，其核心問題在於全球網路治理規範的分歧，反映出不同價值觀與政策優先事項的對立。在此背景下，印太地區憑藉其經濟潛力與科技創新能力，成為推動數位轉型與治理的關鍵戰場。 除了美中競爭，歐盟（EU）作為全球規範性權力（Normative Power Europe, NPE），也試圖在印太地區的數位秩序中發揮影響。然而，相較於美國以市場驅動（market-d..

In an era of rapid technological advancement, the digital domain has become a core battleground for geopolitical competition, reshaping global governance, security, and economic structures. The intensifying U.S.-China technological rivalry is accelerating the fragmentation of the global digital order, with the key challenge being the divergence in global cyber governance norms, reflecting conflicting values and policy priorities. Against this backdrop, the Indo-Pacific region, with its economic potential and technological innovation capacit..

歐盟的中國政策:戰略夥伴關係的實踐
EU's China Policy: An Analysis of Implementing the Strategic Partnership
陳蔚芳(Wei-Fang Chen)
53卷1期(2014/03/01)

本文旨在探討歐盟與中國如何實踐戰略夥伴關係的目標，以及分析在過程中所面臨的阻礙。本文從歐盟與中國如何認知自身國際地位開始，檢視雙方從夥伴關係走向戰略夥伴關係的期望，評估在實質上是否具有此等關係的基礎，以及雙方為何在解除對中國軍售禁令以及承認中國市場經濟地位此二議題上遲遲無法取得共識。本文認為歐盟和中國對於戰略夥伴關係的認知並不明確，在具體議題上缺乏實質合作，因而難以取得突破性的發展。現今歐盟與中國的交往已經進入「務實省思期」，雙方都必須思考如何在現有的框架對..

This article aims to examine the implementation of shaping the EU- China Strategic Partnership and investigate the obstacles they are encountering. Accordingly, the article will answer the following questions: (1)How do the EU and China define their strategic objectives?(2)What do they expect from the implementation of the strategic partnership?(3)Do they have fundamental consensus and benchmarks to shape this relationship? (4)Why does the EU reject to lift the arms embargo against China and refuse to recognise China’s ..

top