期刊內容 Issue content

回列表
從準市場視角檢視日本長照制度中的 公私關係：現況與課題
Public-Private Relationships in Japan’s Long- Term Care Insurance System from a Quasi- Market Perspective: Current Situations and Challenges
林淑馨 (Shu-Hsin Lin)
下載檔案
65卷1期(2026/03/31)
日本於2000年實施長照制度，服務的提供幾乎以營利的私部門為主，公部門和非營利組織所占比例有限，形成「以私為主，以公為輔」的服務供給模式。然而，如是的改變能否發揮公私「相互支應」的功能？在公私版圖大移轉的情況下，公私部門之間的關係有何轉變，又產生哪些問題？這些都是本文所欲探究的問題。
研究發現，日本照護服務的供給確實發揮公私相互支應的功能，在政府全國一致的價格管制下，雖然供給主體也有所不同，但因藉由準公共機關來彌補吸脂效應所產生的缺失，故能使基本照護服務勉強取得平衡，現階段服務供給的穩定性尚能得到保障。只不過，最基層的自治體（村）中仍有部分服務項目未能提供，當初所揭示的保障使用者選擇權的政策目標未能全面（國）達成卻也是不爭的事實。因此，隨著公私雙方職能與角色的轉變，扮演宏觀政策管制者的中央政府與微觀政策執行者的基層自治體，以及擔任服務輸送主體的私部門三者之間如何溝通協調，尤其是面對市場條件較差的偏鄉地區，如何避免僅依賴準公共機關，賦予營利與非營利事業經營誘因，以提升整體照顧力並確保照顧服務能穩定供給，則成為公部門日後改革的重要課題。
Japan adopted the long-term care insurance in 2000, with the majority of the services provided by the private sector, and a limited proportion provided by the public sector and non-profit organizations. The services therefore is mainly provided by the private sector and supplemented by the public sector. However, would this change be able to facilitate mutual support among the public and private sector? What kind of relationship change and issues would occur under the public-private transition? These are the questions that would be discussed in this paper.
Study found that the supply of the Japanese long-term care insurance could be mutually supported by the public and private sectors. Under government’s unified price control, although the subject of the supplier is different, quasi public agencies are able to supplement the faults caused by the cream skimming effect. Therefore, striking a balance in providing basic care service and guaranteeing stability in providing services at the current stage. However, there are still some services that could not be provided primary communities. It is a fact that the objective to guarantee users’ right to choose could not be comprehensively accomplished. Hence, with the transformation of the function and role between public and private sectors where central government as
macro policy supervisor and local municipalities as micro policy executor, and private third party as service provider, how the three entities communicate and coordinate - especially in facing those rural areas with worse market condition- how to avoid over relying on public sector and provide business management incentive to profit and none-profit organizations, have become an important task in future public sector reform.

 

日本 長照制度 社會福利法人 選擇權 準市場 Japan Long-term Care Insurance Social Welfare Legal Entity Options Quasi-market

相關期刊

日本的太空民主聯盟與國際合作：程序理性與偏好抉擇
The Space Democratic Alliance and International Cooperation of Japan: Procedural Rationality and Preference Choice
鄭子真 (Tzu-Chen Cheng)
64卷2期(2025/06/30)

2016年日本通過宇宙2法，揭櫫推動民間升空商機、遙測數據商業等目標，目的在於擴大日本太空商業活動與世界太空市場接軌。其次，2017年美國NASA公布「阿緹米斯計畫」（Artemis program），基於美日同盟和美日安保，日本也積極參與美國主導的月球計畫；日本第5期《宇宙基本計劃》（2023∼2033年）表明日本邁入國際太空合作的動向，並且推出「宇宙安全保障構想」。就此，本文整理日本對應新太空時代的動向、太空與安保、太空民主聯盟等觀點，採用理性抉擇理論的「偏好—機..

In 2016, Japan passed the Space Act which aims to promote private space launch opportunities and the commercialization of remote sensing data, with the goal of expanding Japan’s space commercial activities and aligning with the global space market. Secondly, in 2017, NASA announced the Artemis program (Lunar Program). Based on the U.S.-Japan alliance and U.S.-Japan security arrangements, Japan is also actively participating in the U.S.-led lunar program. The 5th Basic Plan for Space Policy (2023~2033) indicating Japan’s move tow..

日本2001年至2012年預算權改革:不同制度安排之比較
The Japanese Reform on Budget Formulation (2009~2012): Changes and Continuity
林超琦(Chao-Chi Lin)
54卷2期(2015/06/01)

日本政府分別於 2001 年與 2009 年兩度改革預算制度，都是在內閣層級設立新的組織，移轉部分預算編列權限到內閣，希望透過改變編列預算的方式，來提高首相與內閣領導力，並解決各省廳的本位問題。前者是在內閣府設立經財政諮詢會議，後者則是分別在內閣官房與內閣府設立國家戰略室與行政刷新會議。儘管小泉內閣時期，透過經濟財政諮詢會議改革原有的預算編列方式，也成功地刪減財政支出，以及民主黨執政初期，行政刷新會議做出刪減預算的決定，國家戰略室也有設定降低財政赤字的目標，..

The Japanese government reformed its budget institutions and budget processes in 2001 and 2009, establishing the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy(CEFP)in 2001, and the National Strategy Office(NSO)and the Government Revitalization Unit(GRU)in 2009. By moving the Ministry of Finance’s budget formulation authority to the Cabinet, it was expected that these new institutions would facilitate the prime minister’s leadership. However, despite institutional changes, the budget formulation processes and the existing ..

top