長久以來,質性研究遭受過於主觀與不夠嚴謹的批評。紮根理論因應這樣的氛圍而生,紮根理論之研究途徑企圖藉由發展系統性的分析模式以理解「過程」、「情境」及「行動」等概念,並對上述批判作出反駁。然而,因為 Strauss 與 Corbin 兩位原作者在論述上的衝突,開啟了一連串對於概念性與方法論上的爭辯與困惑。因此,本文企圖重新審視紮根理論的不同途徑以便釐清其認識論上的矛盾。同時,本文建議以不同「情境」作為驅動個人行動的主要論述,以便對「譯碼典範」作出修正。最後,我們對 Strauss 與 Corbin 的「條件/結果矩陣」作出修正並提出新的矩陣分析模式,以解釋不同「情境」、「行動」及「分析層級」彼此的連結與互動。
Qualitative research has been criticized for the lack of objectivity and scientific rigor. In response to such criticism, grounded theory emerged as a philosophical and analytical approach to studying the process, action, and context of social phenomena. Nevertheless, the controversy between Strauss and Corbin, the founders of grounded theory, has provoked never-ending academic debates. Confusions are inevitably derived respectively from both theoretical foundations and methodological applications. This research is to clarify the epistemological ambivalence involved in the use of grounded theory. It intends to reconcile the seemingly conflicting viewpoints of different grounded theory schools by revisiting diverse philosophical positions of these schools and revising the “coding paradigm” for analyzing the contexts that drive human actions. Accordingly, a new “conditional/ consequential matrix”, as opposed to Strauss and Corbin’s, is proposed to explain the connections and interactions among various contexts, actions, and micro-mess-macro levels of analysis, helping us generate propositions and build theories.
1970 年代前後,西方曾有許多重大的學術知識「轉向」,旨在批判或修改邏輯實證論的基本結構。政治學界沒有抓好這個重要的轉折,故陷入方法論的困境,而無法調節學門內各領域的關連,形成「分桌吃飯」的局面。這個危機在冷戰驟然結束之時爆發,形成國關內部現實主義和建構主義的大論戰,其後又形成 2001 年美國「政治學的改造運動」。然而,都未能有效地化解政治學內部長年積壓的矛盾。本文認為,索緒爾開啟的現代語言學概念,以及維根斯坦科學哲學後期的逆轉,共同奠定了一道更寬廣的轉..
According to the language concepts defined by Ferdinand De Saussure and the late philosophy created by Ludwig Wittgenstein, this article attempts to point out a possible “turn” that may render the study of politics “an ecumenical science of politics” upheld by Gregory Kasza in the Perestroika movement of the discipline in 2001.
本文主要的目的在於爬梳社會科學方法論中因果機制分析的發展和演進,並進一步評估政治學研究中如何運用因果機制來進行解釋以及討論相關的解釋效力的問題。本文將具體評析政治學國際關係領域中民主和平論之論點,以此來衡量政治學運用因果機制解釋的優勢和侷限。因果機制研究層面上,本文聚焦在機制的定義和類型、機制的觀察性、因果機制與因果關係、法則和中介變數的差異、機制的層次、機制的運作和測量、機制的路徑圖。因果機制運用層面上,本文側重於民主和平論的源起和演進、 民主和平論的重要論述、對於民主和平論的挑戰以及..
The main purpose of this paper is to parse out the development and evolution of causal mechanism and to further evaluate how political research adopts the method of causal mechanism to explain and discuss the explanatory effect in the field of qualitative methods. Our focus is to shed light on the causal mechanism of democratic peace theory in the field of international relations and to gauge its advantages and restraints. On the dimension of causal mechanism, this paper focuses on the definition of mechanism, observation of causal mechanis..
請輸入想查詢的期刊標題、關鍵字、作者相關資訊. Please enter the journal title, keywords, and author-related information you want to query.